SaaS · APIs · Cybersecurity
Build a reviewable compliance evidence plan
Compliance Evidence Gap Pack helps organise one authorised evidence set into claims, controls, source references, missing artefacts, owners, and questions. It supports readiness meetings and audit preparation, but it cannot certify compliance, interpret a regulation for an organisation, or turn a policy statement into proof that a control operated.
Define the claim and scope
State the system, location, period, population, and control owner. “Access is reviewed” needs a population, frequency, approval evidence, and exceptions. “Backups are recoverable” needs the system, test date, result, and remediation. A policy shows intended design; it is not automatically operating evidence.
Classify evidence honestly
Separate current from historical, design from operation, and entity or service scope. A certificate may cover a parent company or one region only. Mark an item missing, expired, out of scope, or supplied by an unverified owner. Do not assign a reassuring label where evidence is absent. Ask for a redacted access export or recovery-test result rather than unnecessary private records.
Give gaps an owner
Each gap needs an artefact, period, scope, due date, acceptance question, and qualified owner. Security, privacy, legal, finance, and operations may own different conclusions. The pack must not submit an audit response, publish a certification, or update a regulator. Evidence can include employee and customer data; use only authorised files and preserve the account boundary.
Prepare a defensible meeting
Explore Compliance Evidence Gap Pack, verify every claim against its source, and let control owners approve remediation. A visible gap is progress when it says exactly what must be collected and who must resolve it.